Awards

Expertise & Dedication At NCA Financial Planners

Our highly rated financial advisors are continually recognized for their expertise and dedication to clients.

In 2017, NCA Financial Planners was named to the Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors for the 10th consecutive year placing them in the esteemed group of Independent Advisory All-Stars. NCA Financial Planners is one of only 12 firms across the country and the only in Ohio to be awarded this honor by Barron's Magazine.

 

Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors1

Barron's

2007 - 2018

Top 1,200 Advisors by State1

Barron's

2010 - 2018


 

 

Top 250 Wealth Advisors2

Forbes

2016 - 2018

Best-In-State Wealth Advisors2

Forbes

2018

 


Top 400 Financial Advisers3

Financial Times

2013 - 2018

Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers4

Investment News

2018


 

 

*Third-party rankings and recognitions are no guarantee of future investment success and do not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance or results. These ratings should not be construed as an endorsement of the advisor.

1Barron’s “Top 100” Financial Advisors List and Barron’s “Top 1,200” Advisors by State

Source: Barron’s “America’s Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors,”September 14, 2018 and Barron’s “America’s Top 1,200 Financial Advisors,” March 10, 2018, respectively. Barron’s is a registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company, L.P. All rights reserved. Barron’s “America’s Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors” and “America’s Top 1,200 Financial Advisors” base their rankings upon data provided by individual advisers and their firms, including submissions by Financial Planners of Cleveland, Inc. dba NCA Financial Planners (“NCA”). Barron’s confirms that data via regulatory databases, cross-checks with securities firms and conversations with individual advisers. The rankings reflect “the volume of assets overseen by the advisors and their teams, revenues generated for the firms and the quality of the advisors’ practices.” The scoring system assigns a top score of 100 and rates the rest by comparing them with the winner. A ranking of “N” denotes an advisor who is new to the list. The formula Barron’s uses to rank advisers is proprietary. It has three major components: assets managed, revenue produced and quality of practice. Investment returns are not a component of the rankings because an advisor's returns are dictated largely by the risk tolerance of clients. The quality-of-practice component includes an evaluation of each advisor's regulatory record. Neither NCA nor any other participating advisers paid a fee to be eligible for the “America’s Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors” or “America’s Top 1,200 Financial Advisors” rankings. NCA is unaware of any undisclosed facts that could potentially invalidate the appropriateness of the rankings. By virtue of disclosing these rankings, NCA is disclosing favorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked above other advisors) and unfavorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked below other advisors). Barron’s does not publish, nor is NCA aware of the percentage of other advisers that received the applicable rankings. The rankings may not be representative of any one client’s experience because of the way in which it is calculated. The rankings are independently granted. The rankings are absolutely not indicative of NCA’s future performance, or any future performance pertaining to its clients’ investments. These rankings or any other rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed as a guarantee that a client will experience a certain level of results or satisfaction if NCA is engaged, nor should it be construed as a current or past endorsement by any of its clients. A copy of NCA’s current written disclosure statement discussing its advisory services and fees remains available upon request. Additional information about Barron’s “America’s Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors” is available at the following link: https://www.barrons.com/articles/top-independent-financial-advisors-1536974606; and the ranking list itself is available at the following link: http://www.barrons.com/report/top-financial-advisors/independent/2018 Additional information about Barron’s “America’s Top 1,200 Financial Advisors” is available at the following link: http://www.barrons.com/report/top-financial-advisors/1000/2018?mod=topadvisor2018_article_embed; and the ranking list itself is available at the following link: http://www.barrons.com/report/top-financial-advisors/1000/ohio/2018

2Forbes Top 250 Wealth Advisors" and Forbes “Best-In-State Wealth Advisors”

“Forbes” is a registered mark of Forbes LLC. Data for the Forbes “Top 250 Wealth Advisors” list and the “Top 250 Wealth Advisors” list and the “Best-In-State Wealth Advisors” list are compiled by Forbes’ partners at “SHOOK™ Research, LLC.”, and are based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. SHOOK scours the financial services industry— banks, brokerages, custodians, insurance companies, clearinghouses and others for nominations. SHOOK accepts advisors who meet pre-determined minimum thresholds and acceptable compliance records. SHOOK invites a limited number of nominees to complete an online survey. Basic Requirements for both the “Top 250 Wealth Advisors” list and the “Best-In-State Wealth Advisors” list include (1) 7 years as an advisor (2) Minimum 1 year at the current firm, with exceptions (acquisitions, etc.). (2) The advisor must be recommended, and nominated, by Firm. (3) Completion of an online survey. (4) Over 50% of revenue/production must be with individuals. (5) Acceptable compliance record. Additional quantitative requirements are the following: (1) Revenue/production; weightings assigned for each. (2) Assets under management—and quality of those assets—both custodied and a scrutinized look at assets held away. (Although individual numbers are used for ranking purposes, we publish the entire team's assets.) (3) Client-related data, such as retention. (4) Portfolio performance is not a factor; audited returns among advisors are rare, and differing client objectives provide varying returns. Additional qualitative requirements are as follows: (1) Telephone and in-person meetings with advisors (if an in-person meeting cannot be accomplished, exceptions are considered in which the interview will occur after a ranking has been published). (2) Advisors that exhibit "best practices" within their practices and approach to working with clients. (only explicitly listed in 2017 and 2018 criteria) (3) Compliance records & u4s. Some “dings” can be overlooked (e.g., firm or product failure beyond the scope of an advisor's due diligence; the older a ding, the less we look). Since there are many gray areas, the SHOOK team is willing to listen to a Firm that is willing to stand behind the advisor with written support from leadership. (4) Advisors that provide a full client experience of service model, investing process, fee structure (higher % of fee-based assets earns more points), and breadth of services, including extensive use of Firm’s platform and resources (eg, liabilities) (5) Credentials (years of service can serve as proxy). (6) Use of team & team dynamics (7) Community involvement (8) Discussions with management, peers, competing peers (9) Telephone and in-person meetings. When using compliance issues to categorize, the following conditions will be considered in order to lessen weightings infractions: (1) Infractions that are denied or closed with no action. (2) Complaint arose from a product, service or advice initiated by a previous advisor or another member or former member of team. (3) Length of time since complaint. (4) Complaints related to product failure not related to investment advice (some limited partnerships, adjusted-rate securities, etc.). (5) Complaints that have been settled (must be proven) to appease a client who remained with the advisor for at least one year following settlement date. (6) Complaints that are proven to be meritless. (7) Actions taken as a result of administrative error or failure by firm. Once an advisor's compliance rating falls into a tenable category, an advisor's rating must be among SHOOK's highest qualitative measures including in-person interview and must consider letters of recommendation from firm. The ranking algorithm is designed to fairly compare the business practices of a large group of advisors based on quantitative and qualitative elements. Data are weighted to ensure priorities are given to dynamics such as preferred “best practices”, business models, recent business activity, etc. Each variable is graded and represents a certain value for each measured component. These data are fed into an algorithm that measures thousands of advisors against each other. Neither NCA nor any other participating advisers paid a fee to be eligible for the “Forbes Top 250 Wealth Advisors” or the “Best-In-State Wealth Advisors” rankings. NCA is unaware of any undisclosed facts that could potentially invalidate the appropriateness of the rankings. By virtue of disclosing these rankings, NCA is disclosing favorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked above other advisors) and unfavorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked below other advisors). The rankings may not be representative of any one client’s experience because of the way in which they are calculated. The rankings are independently granted. The rankings are absolutely not indicative of NCA’s and its advisors’ future performance, or any future performance pertaining to its clients’ investments. These rankings or any other rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed as a guarantee that a client will experience a certain level of results or satisfaction if NCA is engaged, nor should it be construed as a current or past endorsement by any of its clients. A copy of NCA’s current written disclosure statement discussing its advisory services and fees remains available upon request. Additional information about the methodology behind the Forbes Top 250 Wealth Advisors ranking is available at the following link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rjshook/2018/09/12/americas-top-wealth-advisors-2018/#285e0c9c189d; and the ranking list itself is available at the following link: https://www.forbes.com/top-wealth-advisors/#448d89bc1a14. Additional information about the methodology behind the Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisors ranking is available at the following link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rjshook/2018/02/15/forbes-best-in-state-wealth-advisors-methodology/#7b9c491d15dd; and the ranking list itself is available at the following link: https://www.forbes.com/best-in-state-wealth-advisors/#47ac11f4291d.

3Financial Times Top 400

Research for the award was conducted on behalf of the Financial Times by Ignites Research, a Financial Times sister publication (collectively, “FT”). The FT contacts the largest US brokerages to ask for practice information and data for their top advisers across the US. In doing so, they can obtain verified data on assets under management instead of relying on self-reporting by the advisers themselves. They asked for information on advisers with more than 10 years’ experience and that have more than $300m in assets under management. Such minimum criteria filters out most advisers. The FT then invite qualifying advisers out of this group to complete a short questionnaire that gives more information about their practices. They combine that information to their own research on the candidates, including data from regulatory filings. The formula the FT uses to grade advisers is based on six broad factors and calculates a numeric score for each adviser (1) Assets under management: can signal experience managing money and client trust (2) AUM growth rate (look at both one-year and two-year growth rates): can be taken as a proxy for performance, asset retention and ability to generate new business. (3) Years of experience: indicates experience managing assets in different economic and interest-rate environments. (4) Compliance record: provides evidence of past client disputes. A string of complaints could signal problems. (5) Industry certifications (CFA, CFP, etc.): demonstrate technical and industry knowledge and obtaining these designations shows a professional commitment to investment skills. (6) Online accessibility: illustrates commitment to providing investors with easy access and transparent contact information. Assets under management accounted for an average of 70% of each adviser’s score. Additionally, the FT places a cap on the number of advisers from any one state that roughly corresponds to the distribution of millionaires across the US. The FT 400 is presented as an elite group, not a competitive ranking. FT acknowledges that ranking the industry’s top advisers from 1 to 400 would be a futile exercise, since each takes different approaches to their practice and has different specializations.

The following are the subtle changes to the above criteria to the Financial Times Top 400 Financial Advisers across the 2013 to 2018 span:

Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Average % of total score that AUM is considered

80-85

80-85

65

66

66

70

Assets under management minimum requirement (in millions)

250

200

200

300

300

300

FT states "places a cap on the number of advisers from any one state that roughly corresponds to the distribution of millionaires across the US"

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

FT states "look at both one-year and two-year growth rates"

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Average % of total score that accounts for AUM growth rate

Not Listed

Not Listed

Not Listed

Not Listed

Not Listed

17

Neither NCA nor any other participating advisers paid a fee to be eligible for the Financial Times Top 400 ranking. NCA is unaware of any undisclosed facts that could potentially invalidate the appropriateness of the ranking. By virtue of disclosing this ranking, NCA is disclosing favorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked above other advisors) and unfavorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked below other advisors). The ranking may not be representative of any one client’s experience because of the way in which it is calculated. The ranking is independently granted. The ranking is absolutely not indicative of NCA’s and its advisors’ future performance, or any future performance pertaining to its clients’ investments. This ranking or any other rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed as a guarantee that a client will experience a certain level of results or satisfaction if NCA is engaged, nor should it be construed as a current or past endorsement by any of its clients.  A copy of NCA’s current written disclosure statement discussing its advisory services and fees remains available upon request. Additional information about the methodology behind the Financial Times Top 400 ranking is available at the following link: https://www.ft.com/content/eb2ec3f0-1249-11e8-a765-993b2440bd73; and the ranking list itself is available at the following link: http://prod-upp-image-read.ft.com/219a1dce-2c60-11e8-9b4b-bc4b9f08f381

4Investment News Best Places to Work For Financial Advisers

With to respect to InvestmentNews’ “Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers” award, NCA provides the following information to the best of its knowledge: Source: InvestmentNews’ “Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers,” March 2018. InvestmentNews is a multi-media news outlet that provides news, analysis, and information directed towards the financial advisory community through its publication of a weekly newspaper, website, newsletters, research, events, videos, and webcasts. InvestmentNews is part of Crain Communications, Inc., one of the largest privately held media companies in the U.S. with 55 leading business, trade and consumer publications in North America, Europe and Asia. In connection to the “Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers” award, InvestmentNews has partnered with Best Companies Group (“BCG”) to research and evaluate nominees on InvestmentNews’ behalf. BCG is a division of Bridge Tower Media (a multi-title publishing and events company) that identifies and recognizes best employers at the city, state, regional and industry level. NCA is not affiliated with InvestmentNews, Crain Communications, Inc., BCG, or BridgeTower Media. NCA’s receipt of this award should not be viewed as an endorsement of NCA by any of these unaffiliated entities. To be eligible for consideration, companies must be a registered investment adviser (RIA), affiliated with an independent broker-dealer (BD), or a hybrid doing business through an RIA, be in the business for a minimum of one year and have a firm-wide minimum of 15 full-time/part-time employees based in the U.S. (across all divisions and departments). The assessment process is a two-part process designed to gather detailed data about each participating company. In part one, the employer completes an employer questionnaire detailing information about the company’s policies, practices, benefits, and demographics. Part two of the assessment process requires that a certain number of employees from each nominated company complete an “Employee Engagement & Satisfaction Survey” consisting of approximately 78 statements that employees respond to on a 1 to 5 point Likert scale of agreement ranging from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” In addition to these statements, the employee survey also includes 2 open ended questions and 7 demographic questions. Each company’s employees are surveyed at random. The total number of employees surveyed from each company is contingent upon the respective company’s size in accordance with the following criterion: (i) companies with 15-99 will have all employees surveyed, (ii) companies with 100-199 employees will have no more than 250 employees surveyed; (iii) companies with 200-499 employees will have no more than 350 employees surveyed, (iv) companies with 500-2499 employees will have no more than 400 surveyed; (v) companies with 2,500 or more employees will have no more than 350 employees surveyed. To ensure the credibility of the information, companies with 15-24 employees must have an 80% or better response rate to be considered for the list. The results of the employee surveys are analyzed and categorized according to 9 Core Focus Areas: Leadership and Planning, Corporate Culture and Communications, Role Satisfaction, Work Environment, Relationship with Supervisor, Training, Development and Resources, Pay and Benefits and Overall Engagement. Each company is ranked based on this data. Firms with a questionable history are called and interviewed to ensure any questionable events are consistent with the respective firm’s submission responses, the award program’s evaluation criteria, and assessment process. After this two-part process is completed, the two respective data sets derived from this process are combined and analyzed to determine the rankings. As of 2018, 60 out of the 100-plus firms that applied for consideration met the award designation’s qualifying criterion. Subsequently, 50 companies were ultimately selected to receive the award designation. Out of these 50 companies, NCA was selected to be recognized on the 2018 “Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers” ranking. InvestmentNews does not require membership or payment to be considered for the award. Neither NCA, nor any other participating advisers, paid a fee to be considered for the Investment News’ “Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers” ranking. NCA applied for consideration, and the result was independently granted. NCA is unaware of any undisclosed facts that could potentially invalidate the appropriateness of the ranking. By virtue of disclosing this ranking, NCA is disclosing favorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked above other advisors) and unfavorable ratings (to the extent that NCA is ranked below other advisors). This ranking or any other rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed as a guarantee that a client will experience a certain level of results or satisfaction if NCA is engaged, nor is the ranking indicative of NCA’s and its advisors’ future performance, or any future performance pertaining to its clients’ investments. A copy of NCA’s current written disclosure statement discussing its advisory services and fees remains available upon request. Additional information about the assessment process behind the Investment News Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers ranking is available at the following link: http://www.inbestplacestowork.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=43 The ranking list is available at the following link: http://inbestplacestowork.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=54&Itemid=78 The alphabetical list of 2018 recipients, is available at the following link: http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20180324/FREE/180319970/best-places-to-work-for-financial-advisers

Check the background of this investment professional on FINRA's BrokerCheck.